Case Study: Real Costs and ROI — Busk Properties
Real Project. Real Numbers.

Case Study:
Costs and ROI

A full breakdown of a real project from our portfolio, including every cost, the actual timeline, a challenge we encountered midway through, and the return delivered to our investor.

Property Type 4-Bed HMO, West Yorkshire
Strategy Refurbish and Hold for Yield
Published by Aidan and Avril Magee

Capital Invested

£47,000

Fixed-term, asset-secured

Net ROI

14.2%

Annualised return

Project Duration

11 mo

2 months over original plan

Investor Return

£6,700

Paid in full at completion

A 4-Bed HMO in West Yorkshire

A full refurbishment of a tired 4-bedroom terraced property acquired below market value in a strong HMO demand corridor near a major hospital and business district.

We are sharing the complete picture here, including a delay and cost overrun midway through. We do this because we believe investors deserve to see how a project actually unfolds, not just a version that makes everything look straightforward.

This is a standard investor report. Every project we deliver comes with the same level of transparency.

Property4-Bed Terraced HMOFull refurbishment and conversion
LocationWest YorkshireHigh rental demand corridor
StrategyRefurbish and HoldLong-term rental yield
Acquired£128,000Below market value, auction
Investor Capital£47,000Secured against the asset
HMO LicenceGranted Month 9First application, no objections

Full Cost Breakdown

Every pound spent on this project is listed below. Projected versus actual figures are shown side by side so you can see exactly where we were on plan and where we were not.

Cost Item Projected Actual Variance
Acquisition Price £128,000 £128,000 On plan
Refurbishment Works £34,500 £37,200 +£2,700
Planning and Licensing £1,800 £1,800 On plan
Finance and Holding Costs £5,200 £6,100 +£900
Management and Legal Fees £2,400 £2,400 On plan
Contingency Budgeted £6,500 £3,600 used £2,900 returned
Total Project Cost £178,400 £179,100

The refurbishment overrun was caused by undiscovered damp in one bedroom, identified during first-fix. The investor was notified within 48 hours. The additional cost was absorbed within the contingency and did not affect the investor's return.

Month by Month: How It Unfolded

The original programme was 9 months. The project completed in 11. Here is exactly what happened and why.

Month 1

Acquisition and Setup

Property acquired at auction. HMO licence application submitted. Refurbishment contractor appointed following a competitive tender process.

Months 2 to 4

First Fix Works

Full rewire, new plumbing and structural partition works completed. Investor received progress photographs at the end of each month.

On schedule

Month 5

Issue Identified and Communicated

Damp discovered in Bedroom 3. Investor notified within 48 hours. Remediation quote obtained and approved within one week. Cost absorbed within contingency.

+£2,700. Within contingency.

Months 6 to 8

Second Fix and Fit Out

Kitchens, bathrooms, flooring and decoration completed to specification. Damp remediation added approximately 6 weeks to the programme.

Months 9 to 10

Licensed and Tenanted

HMO licence granted on first application. All 4 rooms tenanted within 3 weeks of completion. Full occupancy achieved before Month 11.

Full occupancy achieved

Month 11

Capital and Return Paid

Full capital returned plus agreed return, paid on schedule. Despite a 2-month overrun, investor return was fully protected within the project structure.

£53,700 returned to investor

Return on Investment

These are the actual figures delivered to the investor on this project.

Capital Invested

£47,000

Fixed-term, secured against the property throughout the project.

Investor Profit

£6,700

Total return paid at completion, on top of full capital returned.

How This Compares

Annualised return, approximate market figures for context
This Project (Busk Properties)14.2%
FTSE 100 Average Annual Return7.5%
Average UK Buy-to-Let Yield5.5%
UK Savings Account Best Rate4.9%

Comparison figures are approximate market averages shown for context only. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Property investment carries risk and returns are not guaranteed.

Lessons from This Project

Every project teaches us something. These are the four things this one reinforced.

Contingency Is Not Optional

The damp issue would have caused serious problems without a properly budgeted contingency. We always budget 15 to 20% above our refurbishment estimate, and this project is a clear example of why that discipline matters.

Communicate Early, Not Late

Our investor heard about the issue within 48 hours of discovery. That speed of communication is a commitment, not a courtesy. Investors should never find out about problems secondhand or after the fact.

Prepare for Tenancy Before Completion

Having referencing and marketing in place before completion meant full occupancy in under three weeks. Void periods cost money, and reducing them requires preparation, not luck.

Structure Protects the Investor

Despite a 2-month overrun, the investor's return was not affected. That is by design. The legal and financial structure should protect you when things do not go exactly to plan.

Our Commitment to Every Investor

This Is How We Report to Every Investor

Every investor we work with receives a written update at each project milestone, full access to actual versus projected costs, and honest communication the moment anything changes. This case study is not a marketing piece. It is an example of a standard investor report.

Want More Like This?

Get Free Insights Direct to Your Inbox

Practical, honest guidance for property investors, delivered free to your inbox by Aidan and Avril Magee at Busk Properties.